This is the wild west; The blockchains ecosystem differs from the traditional financial world in that it lacks a central authority to take responsibility for a major system failure. These systems are what we call “antifragile”, a term used to describe systems that get stronger as they are exposed to more stress. The term was coined by Nassim Taleb. So how does the blockchain deal with these major system failures? It relies on a combination of social consensus and technical protocols to recover.
The Distinction Between Exchanges and Blockchains
The failure of a centralized exchange like the FTX scandal should not be considered the same as a blockchain failure. CEXs are centralized entities that provide a platform for users to interface with the blockchain; it is not the blockchain itself. The fall of a blockchain often involves loss of access to funds by users since the exchange serves as a custodian for their wallets. Depending on the country, there is a little chance users can recover some of the funds after years of legal proceedings.
However, if the underlying blockchain itself fails, recovering the blockchain would require the network’s global community of node operators and developers to come together to figure out a way to recover it.
Hard Forks: The Ultimate Reset
Hard Forks are the most effective way to recover a failed blockchain. When a blockchain fails, the community can collectively decide to create a new version of the history where the failure is corrected. This was the case in the infamous 2016 DAO hack on Ethereum. This often requires a majoritarian social consensus among the community members, including developers, miners/validators, and users.
Checkpoints and State Restoration
To better handle these major failures, many modern networks now use checkpoints. This involves selecting a collectively agreed “final block” that serves as a checkpoint for the blockchain to revert to in case of a major failure or massive reorganization. This ensures that even if a portion of the network is compromised, the “source of truth” remains protected by the honest majority.
Slashing and Consensus Re-alignment
In Proof of Stake (PoS) networks, recovery from a liveness failure (where the chain stops producing blocks) often involves slashing. If a large group of validators goes offline or acts maliciously, the protocol can automatically penalize their stakes. This rebalances the voting power among honest, active participants, allowing the chain to restart even if a significant percentage of its original infrastructure is missing.
Disclaimer: BFM Times acts as a source of information for knowledge purposes and does not claim to be a financial advisor. Kindly consult your financial advisor before investing.
